<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dan Zarrella - Latest Comments in Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://danzarrella.disqus.com/gender_differences_in_retweeting/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:22:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting enough findings to inspire a larger study by a recognized research organization...I'd say.  Another variable to consider: aren't the bulk of men/women on Twitter really all about marketing or business?  So "selling of yourself" is key and that can be done in different ways.  Some people choose the "about me" angle and others choose the "share info" angle.   It may boil down to gender to some degree, but there are also just differences in individual business style.  Good conversation to start, Dan!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea Learned</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Maria, i too was suprised by the gender differences, though i dont want to stereotype the sexes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting information. I too am curious about the sample size and where your sample population came from.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Skye Callan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like sexist pseudo-science to me.  You quote no data source, and your metrics don't accurately reflect my retweets or those of numerous other males I follow.  Maybe you just follow simpleminded men for some reason?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edward Virtually</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sample size?&lt;br&gt;Margin of error?&lt;br&gt;How confident do you feel that this was a truly random sample and representative of the overall Twitter population and not just the social media/tech types that follow you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:21:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting...I love these little studies. Out of curiosity where'd you get your sample population from and how many people was it comprised of (e.g., how many males versus females)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gender Differences in ReTweeting</title><link>http://danzarrella.com/gender.html#comment-15179946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The gender differences surprised me a bit.  I would have thought it be the other way around, especially given topics.  Great stuff, as usual Dan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maria Reyes-McDavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:03:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>